October 21, 2008
Are Feminists Liberal or are Liberals Feminists?
Can you be politically conservative and be a feminist? Or does being a feminist automatically mean you are politically liberal. I recently saw a blurb, in reference to Sarah Palin on SNL, which if you have not seen the opening skit, it was funny. THe line i read said that one reason McCain picked Sarah Palin was to attract conservative feminists. I sat and thought about that for a minute, I don't think I have ever met a person who identified as a Feminist and also conservative. Republican maybe, but not conservative. What are some if the Feminists ideals - Feminism is the belief that women should be equal to men. What about specific issues that the Feminist agenda is associated with; Reproductive rights, equal pay, access to health care and childcare, women having the choice to work in or out of the home or both. So far most of these ideals, which appeal to me as a liberal, are more of the liberal and Democratic agenda.
October 1, 2008
Let's talk about the Gays...
There are so many things that Ms. Palin says in her interviews which make me want to reach through the computer and ask her WHY???? WHY?? The latest has been her assertion that homosexuality is a choice. When asked how she feels about homosexuals, her line is that for those people who CHOOSE to live that lifestyle, that is their choice. NO, it is not a choice. Of course this is from someone who doesn't believe in teaching evolution. Where did we get so far off, that science and biology have become unnecessary. Sorry Ms. Palin, it is not a choice, who would choose to live a lifestyle in which you are constantly treated as a second-class citizen. Not given full rights to live with a partner, that same-sex couples enjoy. It is about the privilege as much as the responsibility of choosing to live your life with someone, what choice is there is being gay? The choice to constantly battle for your freedoms, protections, respect? The choice I see, is in those brave enough to come out to themselves, their families and friends. Just to add insult to injury, she pulled the good old, well one of my dearest-closest friends has chosen to live her life "that way". Really, good for you! She can't actually say the word gay or lesbian.
Mental Health Parity is almost here!
For those of you who don't know what this is, personally it is one of the more important pieces of legislation that has been bouncing around for the past few years. In short form, it means that for any group health insurance plans, benefits for treatment of mental health and substance abuse must be the same as benefits for all other health treatments. Typically health plans limit the number of visits to a mental health provider, cap the number days for in or out patient treatment for substance abuse and mental health issues. It would basically be like your insurance capping the number of sick visits you could have in any one year, or number and length of hospital visits. Ok, this is not to get into that hospitalization days are capped, and yes I do not always agree with that.
This is huge change in the paradigm of how mental health and substance abuse treatment is viewed. For one thing, as most people who suffer with or know someone with a MH or SA problem, it is real, it needs medical treatment and care. Also, many of these "problems" are considered lifestyle issues, not taken seriously, or generally swept under the carpet. It is and can be a very difficult thing to admit to yourself, and then once you do, and try to get treatment, you are stopped because your health insurance plan doesn't have mental health coverage. However, if you had high blood pressure, or pain in your chest, you better believe you would have unlimited access to utilize your health benefits. What is so different between the two? Nothing really, both have physical symptoms, both lead to loss of work potentially, you could die from both. So why is the access to treatment so different?
How about substance abuse issues. Again, a person reaches the point, however they got there, that they have a problem that needs medical attention, or it could potentially slowly destroy their lives. Not allowing access to treatment or having a low number of maximums days for treatment, would be akin to only providing a cancer patient with half the required chemo treatments necessary. Finally, my other big issue is that many diseases or illnesses are often difficult to place in the health vs mental health category. Often insurance companies, because mental health benefits are so less, place illness like anorexia and bulimia in the MH category. Again, we put these people, mostly women, in a position where treatment is not available, and they suffer. Often many patients that fall into any of these categories, slowly loose their lives, work, family, roof, all of it. Health insurance in the US is far from perfect, there are many things that need to be done to improve it. But if the House passes the bill Friday, Mental Health Parity will be real, one step closer to acknowledges these are real health issues with far reaching consequences if left un-treated or under treated.
Whoa, I will get out of network benefit coverage again!
This is huge change in the paradigm of how mental health and substance abuse treatment is viewed. For one thing, as most people who suffer with or know someone with a MH or SA problem, it is real, it needs medical treatment and care. Also, many of these "problems" are considered lifestyle issues, not taken seriously, or generally swept under the carpet. It is and can be a very difficult thing to admit to yourself, and then once you do, and try to get treatment, you are stopped because your health insurance plan doesn't have mental health coverage. However, if you had high blood pressure, or pain in your chest, you better believe you would have unlimited access to utilize your health benefits. What is so different between the two? Nothing really, both have physical symptoms, both lead to loss of work potentially, you could die from both. So why is the access to treatment so different?
How about substance abuse issues. Again, a person reaches the point, however they got there, that they have a problem that needs medical attention, or it could potentially slowly destroy their lives. Not allowing access to treatment or having a low number of maximums days for treatment, would be akin to only providing a cancer patient with half the required chemo treatments necessary. Finally, my other big issue is that many diseases or illnesses are often difficult to place in the health vs mental health category. Often insurance companies, because mental health benefits are so less, place illness like anorexia and bulimia in the MH category. Again, we put these people, mostly women, in a position where treatment is not available, and they suffer. Often many patients that fall into any of these categories, slowly loose their lives, work, family, roof, all of it. Health insurance in the US is far from perfect, there are many things that need to be done to improve it. But if the House passes the bill Friday, Mental Health Parity will be real, one step closer to acknowledges these are real health issues with far reaching consequences if left un-treated or under treated.
Whoa, I will get out of network benefit coverage again!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)